When the 24 cabinet secretaries and top-level officials in Donald Trump’s new government assemble, they will form one of the wealthiest administrations in history. Whether they are the very wealthiest is impossible to say, since official disclosures top out at “over $50m”—a pittance for some of the assembled. But such disclosures are helpful in another way: they shine a light on the widely varying investment strategies of MAGA luminaries, and thus their widely varying outlooks on the world.
For many, the lion’s share of their wealth is held in private firms. This is true of two of the richest: Howard Lutnick (Mr Trump’s nominee to be commerce secretary) and Linda McMahon (the education nominee), whose wealth is counted in the billions. Mr Lutnick is chairman of Cantor Fitzgerald, a brokerage and investment bank. Ms McMahon, whose finances are yet to be disclosed, owes most of her riches to World Wrestling Entertainment, a sports-media business. At the other end of the spectrum, Lori Chavez-DeRemer (labour) owns a stake worth between $1m and $5m in SJJD Consulting, a recreational-cannabis producer with a licence to operate in Oregon, her home state.
Property investments are another recurring theme. Most cabinet members and would-be members are landlords; none is more enthusiastic than Doug Burgum, the secretary of the interior. Twenty-four years ago he sold Great Plains Software, a technology firm, to Microsoft for $1.1bn of the computing giant’s stock. He has since bought up swathes of land across his home state of North Dakota and neighbouring Montana, which will have appreciated nicely: house prices are on the rise in both states. He would have been better advised to keep hold of the Microsoft stock, however, which has risen in value by more than 1,200% since he sold his company.
That is where the similarities end. The most obvious differences concern overall levels of wealth. Scott Bessent, a hedge-fund titan whom Mr Trump has selected as treasury secretary, owns art and antiques worth $1m-5m, or at least five times the value of all assets reported by Marco Rubio, America’s secretary of state. Mr Bessent has holdings in stock and bond exchange-traded funds (ETFs), and hundreds of millions of dollars in bets on international currency markets. The latter is a meat-and-potatoes choice for a hedge-fund magnate, even if it would be a little adventurous for an average retail investor.
The portfolios of Jamieson Greer, Mr Trump’s nominee to be US trade representative, and John Ratcliffe, the new director of the CIA, are largely held in pedestrian stock and bond funds, bank accounts and annuities, as well as a few individual stocks. By contrast, some MAGA types have quite literally bought into the cause. Pam Bondi, the attorney-general, holds between $2m and $10m in shares and warrants in Trump Media and Technology Group, which owns Truth Social, the president’s social-media network. Ms McMahon sits on the company’s board.
No single asset class better illustrates the divide between the financially conservative and the new American right than cryptocurrencies. Mr Trump now has exposure to digital assets himself through the $TRUMP meme coin he launched shortly before his inauguration. Six of the 24 cabinet secretaries and cabinet-level officials own bitcoin or other tokens, including J.D. Vance, the vice-president. This group is in the ascendancy both politically and financially: bitcoin has risen in price by more than 130% in the past year, trouncing returns from traditional assets.
Indeed, two of Mr Trump’s most controversial appointments are big digital-asset investors. Robert F. Kennedy junior holds between $1m and $5m in bitcoin. Tulsi Gabbard, the nominee for director of national intelligence, is a crypto omnivore, with $30,000-100,000 in bitcoin and up to $15,000 each in cronos, ethereum and solana, three smaller coins. Although Mr Bessent reports an investment in a bitcoin ETF, it accounts for less than 0.1% of his assets.
The new cabinet’s level of crypto enthusiasm outstrips that among the broader American population. According to a survey conducted by the Pew Research Centre, 15% of rich American households own cryptocurrencies, with their popularity skewed to younger investors. Such an unusual level of exposure will surely buttress the administration’s support for the industry. Not only is the incoming cabinet ideologically committed to crypto—they have a huge personal stake in its success, too.■
Subscribers to The Economist can sign up to our new Opinion newsletter, which brings together the best of our leaders, columns, guest essays and reader correspondence.